Andrew Tate labels Jordan Peterson 'childish' for supporting 'war' amid Israel-Palestine conflict, t

BUCHAREST, ROMANIA: Andrew Tate, the polarizing figure in the world of social media, recently took to X to criticize the stance of Canadian psychologist and author, Jordan Peterson, regarding his endorsement of war amidst the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Also Read: Internet wonders if Andrew Tate’s ‘coward’ diss was for Adin Ross or Jordan Peterson

Tate and Peterson have a long history of not supporting each other. On numerous occasions, Peterson has publicly criticized Tate, and the feeling is mutual.

Peterson once referred to Andrew Tate as the 'lowest form of life.'

What did Andrew Tate say about Jordan Peterson's remarks on Israel-Palestine conflict?

Following the news of the outbreak of conflict between Israel and Palestine, many individuals were deeply saddened by the situation.

Also Read: Jordan Peterson dubs Joe Rogan ‘most powerful journalist’ after controversial 'micro cult' remark

However, Peterson took a rather unusual stance on the matter, expressing on the platform, "Give 'em hell @netanyahu Enough is enough."

Also Read: UFC champion Sean Strickland labels Andrew Tate 'con artist' for lack of remorse over scamming men: 'He's not your messiah'

Peterson's call for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to take a strong stance against Palestine was met with disapproval from Tate.

In a podcast on Rumble, Tate addressed Peterson's remarks, stating, "I find it extremely asinine and quite childish, hypocritical, and also disingenuous that people like Peterson would call for the genocide and call for war when truthfully he would hate to be anywhere near a war."

Tate went on to add, "Jordan Peterson is not a soldier. For him to sit to try and advocate destruction when he himself can't handle Twitter (X) haters and needs absolute peace of mind to sleep at night without drugs.

I find that quite disingenuous. If it came to your doorstep you would be begging for peace."

Andrew Tate's trolls assert that he is a loser

After Tate's critique of Peterson's statements regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict, numerous users stepped forward to voice their opinions on his comments.

One user wrote, "But tate was advocating for Palestine over weekend... what a looooser... now he wants to play the moral high ground.... he totally flipped his tune!"

Another user wrote, "Tates right, no one wants war. About Jordan Peterson he said that he would like to debate and speak with him one day."

A user stated, "They both call each other names and are hypocrite in one way or the other. But that doesn’t make anyone of them bad for the public to take motivation about the right things to improve their life…."

but tate was advocating for Palestine over weekend... what a looooser... now he wants to play the moral high ground.... he totally flipped his tune!

Tates right, no one wants war. About Jordan Peterson he said that he would like to debate and speak with him one day.

They both call each other names and are hypocrite in one way or the other. But that doesn’t make anyone of them bad for the public to take motivation about the right things to improve their life….

More from MEAWW

Mehdi Hasan: Jordan Peterson slammed for making bizarre claim about MSNBC anchor's skin color

What happened between Andrew Tate and Jordan Peterson? Here's why psychologist labeled misogynistic influencer 'lowest form of life'

ncG1vNJzZmillZbEuHrCqKRomZ6Zv6bDjK2YrZ1doa6jscusZKOnopmur3nPnqueqqOku26vx6KjnaGjnXqnu9Fmqq6ooKS%2FtbXNoGSwmaJirq61w2agrKqRmrluvMClnKysmaOybq%2FOp52loZOperW%2BzqWjrGWTlrmtedOop2afXZZ6rbvSnqk%3D